Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
http.://www.avert.org/indiaaids.htm
http://www.nacoonline.org/facts_reportjuly.htm

India has a population of one billion, around half of whom are adults in the sexually active age group. The first AIDS case in India was detected in 1986, and since then HIV infection has been reported in all States and Union Territories.
The spread of HIV in India has been diverse, with much of India having a low rate of infection and the epidemic being most extreme in the southern half of the country and in the far north-east. The highest HIV prevalence rates are found in Maharashtra in the west; Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka in the south; and Manipur and Nagaland in the north-east. 1
As of May 2005, 92% of all nationally reported AIDS cases have been found in 10 of the 38 States Union Territories. The greatest numbers were in Maharashtra and Gujarat in the west; Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh in the south; and Manipur in the north-east.2
In the southern States, the infections are mostly due to heterosexual contact, while infections are mainly found amongst injecting drug users in Manipur and Nagaland.3
Estimated numbers of adults and children living with HIV/AIDS, end of 20033
|
Group |
Living with HIV/AIDS |
|
Adults |
5,000,000 |
|
Women |
1,900,000 |
|
Children |
120,000 |
|
Total |
5,100,000 |
|
Adult HIV prevalence estimate |
0.9% |
The Indian National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) estimates that 5.134 million people were living with HIV in 2004. This represents a slight increase from the 2003 estimate, and a substantial increase from 4.58 million in 2002. Only South Africa has more people living with HIV. 4
AIDS data, end of May 20052
Gender Cumulative AIDS cases Male 77,457 Female 31,892 Total 109,349
The statistics for AIDS cases may be a poor guide to the severity of the epidemic, as in many situations a patient will die without HIV having been diagnosed, and with the cause of death attributed to an opportunistic infection, such as tuberculosis or PCP.
|
Transmission Categories |
Number of cases |
% |
|
Age group |
Male |
Female |
Total |
|
Sexual |
93,964 |
85.93 |
0-14 |
2,779 |
1,945 |
4,744 |
|
|
Perinatal |
3,957 |
3.62 |
15-29 |
21,440 |
14,149 |
35,589 |
|
|
Blood and blood products |
2,201 |
2.01 |
30-49 |
47,312 |
14,159 |
61,471 |
|
|
Injecting drug users |
2,661 |
2.43 |
≥=50 |
5,906 |
1,639 |
7,545 |
|
|
Others (not specified) |
6,566 |
6.00 |
Total |
77,457 |
31,892 |
109,349 |
|
|
Total |
109,349 |
100% |
|
||||
|
State/Union Territory |
AIDS cases |
|
Andhra Pradesh |
11,819 |
|
Assam |
225 |
|
Arunachal Pradesh |
0 |
|
A & N Islands |
33 |
|
Bihar |
155 |
|
Chattisgarh |
0 |
|
Chandigarh (UT) |
1,181 |
|
Delhi |
950 |
|
Daman & Diu |
1 |
|
Dadra & Nagar Haveli |
0 |
|
Goa |
555 |
|
Gujarat |
5,561 |
|
Haryana |
469 |
|
Himachal Pradesh |
239 |
|
Jharkhand |
0 |
|
Jammu & Kahmir |
2 |
|
Karnataka |
2,478 |
|
Kerala |
1,769 |
|
Lakshadweep |
0 |
|
Madhya Pradesh |
1,347 |
|
Maharashtra |
13,402 |
|
Orissa |
128 |
|
Nagaland |
736 |
|
Manipur |
2,866 |
|
Mizoram |
106 |
|
Meghalaya |
8 |
|
Pondicherry |
302 |
|
Punjab |
292 |
|
Rajasthan |
1,153 |
|
Sikkim |
8 |
|
Tamil Nadu |
52,036 |
|
Tripura |
5 |
|
Uttranchal |
0 |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
1,383 |
|
West Bengal |
2,397 |
|
Ahemdabad M C |
520 |
|
Chennai MC |
0 |
|
Mumbai MC |
7,223 |
|
Total |
109,349 |
The prevalence rates below are taken from data collected during screening of women attending antenatal clinics.
Some are
State/Union Territory HIV prevalence (%) Andhra Pardesh 2.25 Arunachal Pradesh 0.17 Assam 0.00 Bihar 0.00 Chattisgarh 0.00 Goa 1.13 Gujarat 0.13 Haryana 0.00 Himachal Pradesh 0.13 Jammu & Kashmir 0.08 Jharkhand 0.00 Karnataka 1.25 Kerala 0.33 Madhya Pardesh 0.25 Maharashtra 1.25 Mumbai 1.12 Manipur 1.50 Meghalaya 0.00 Mizoram 1.25 Nagaland 1.43 Orissa 0.50 Punjab 0.25 Rajasthan 0.00 Sikkim 0.00 Tamil Nadu 0.50 Tripura 0.30 Uttar Pradesh 0.25 Uttranchal 0.00 West Bengal 0.50 A & N Islands 0.00 Chandigarh 0.50 D & N Haveli 0.00 Daman & Diu 0.38 Lakshdweep 0.00 Pondicherry 0.25
as report an HIV prevalence rate of 0 in antenatal clinics. This does not necessarily mean that there is no HIV in the area, as some of them report the presence of the virus at STD clinics and amongst injecting drug users. In many states and territories, the average antenatal HIV prevalence is based on reports from fewer than five clinics.



| Subscribe to MDGs-India-YPs | |
| Powered by groups.yahoo.com | |